Permission for Porn the Minister argues for! Absolutely unbelievable. read the Guardian article below for details. Why would anyone need permission for some activity which is not deemed illegal? This is a serious attack not only on the right to receive information but also on the privacy and autonomy of individuals. Why would anyone living in the UK need permission to access pornography on the Internet? This is a moral crusade with the excuse of “protecting children” while completely ignoring the rights of adults. Any policy initiative need to distinguish between these two fundamental issues. I have written back in 1999 on a short book entitled Sex on the Net that “there is a real danger that the use of filtering and rating systems may transform the Internet into a “family friendly” medium, no more adventurous than the likes of the BBC.” Looks like I was not wrong after all…

With serious concerns for net neutrality, combined with the three-strikes-out approach being adopted for piracy and now the potential for a permission for porn policy the Internet development in the UK looks quiet bleak. (Dr. Yaman Akdeniz)

The Guardian: Broadband firms urged to block sex websites to protect children

Government wants BT, Virgin and other internet providers to put access to pornography on ‘opt-in’ basis

* Caroline Davies
* guardian.co.uk, Sunday 19 December 2010 15.52 GMT
* Article history

Internet service providers are to be asked by the government to tighten up on website pornography to try to combat the early sexualisation of children.

Ministers believe broadband providers should consider automatically blocking sex sites, with individuals being required to opt in to receive them, rather than opt out and use the available computer parental controls.

Ed Vaizey, the communications minister, is to meet internet providers, including BT, Virgin Media and TalkTalk, ‘in the near future’ to discuss changing the way pornography enters private homes, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills confirmed. The move is designed to protect children from being exposed to pornography on the net.

‘This is a very serious matter. I think it is very important that it’s the ISPs that some up with solutions to protect children,’ Vaizey told the Sunday Times.

‘I’m hoping they will get their acts together so that we don’t have to legislate, but we are keeping an eye on the situation and we will have a new communications bill in the next couple of years.’

The action follows the success of moves by most British internet providers to prevent people inadvertently viewing child pornography websites.

Now ministers want to see adult pornography controlled with similar technology, with sites blocked unless people specifically request access to them. Internet providers had said implementing the scheme would be technically difficult and cost too much. However, some now seem willing to implement the scheme voluntarily.

Andrew Heaney, TalkTalk’s executive director of strategy and regulation, told the newspaper: ‘Our objective was not to do what the politicians want us but to do what is right for our customers. If other companies aren’t going to do it of their own volition, then maybe they should be leant on.’

Virgin Media said that it had already implemented the technology on its mobile service, but said that parents can control what their children see at home and online. A BT spokesman said they had a ‘clean feed’ system to stop access to illegal sites.

In a parliamentary debate last month, Claire Perry, a Conservative MP who has campaigned for tighter controls, said that 60% of nine- to 19-year-olds had found porn online, while only 15% of computer-literate parents knew how to use filters to block access to certain sites.

The MP said six companies – BT, Virgin, Talk Talk, BSkyB, Orange and 02 – streamed the internet to 90% of homes in the UK. Perry called on the government to put pressure on those companies to install default measures to stop children accessing pornography online.