<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CyberLaw Blog &#187; Database Nation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyberlaw.org.uk/category/database-nation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyberlaw.org.uk</link>
	<description>A news resource for CyberLaw and Cyber-Rights issues from around the globe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:26:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Prove data retention law&#8217;s usefulness or repeal it, says EU privacy chief</title>
		<link>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/12/07/prove-data-retention-laws-usefulness-or-repeal-it-says-eu-privacy-chief/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/12/07/prove-data-retention-laws-usefulness-or-repeal-it-says-eu-privacy-chief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 16:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlaw.org.uk/?p=3203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prove data retention law&#8217;s usefulness or repeal it, says EU privacy chief: &#8220;The Data Retention Directive is the most privacy-invasive piece of legislation ever adopted by the European Union and has never been fully justified, Europe&#8217;s top privacy watchdog has said.&#8220;
(Via OUT-LAW News.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/out-law-NewsRoundUP/~3/Srjj8SN_uYQ/default.aspx">Prove data retention law&#8217;s usefulness or repeal it, says EU privacy chief</a>: &#8220;The Data Retention Directive is the most privacy-invasive piece of legislation ever adopted by the European Union and has never been fully justified, Europe&#8217;s top privacy watchdog has said.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/out-law-NewsRoundUP/~4/Srjj8SN_uYQ" height="1" width="1">&#8220;</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.out-law.com/">OUT-LAW News</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/12/07/prove-data-retention-laws-usefulness-or-repeal-it-says-eu-privacy-chief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Commission takes UK to court over alleged privacy law failings</title>
		<link>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/09/30/commission-takes-uk-to-court-over-alleged-privacy-law-failings/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/09/30/commission-takes-uk-to-court-over-alleged-privacy-law-failings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phorm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlaw.org.uk/?p=3082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commission takes UK to court over alleged privacy law failings: &#8220;The European Commission is taking the UK to court, claiming that UK law does not protect citizens&#8217; privacy as strongly as EU laws demand. The case centres on the UK Government&#8217;s response to the Phorm web monitoring scandal.&#8220;
(Via OUT-LAW News.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/out-law-NewsRoundUP/~3/KG8nHIE29fc/default.aspx">Commission takes UK to court over alleged privacy law failings</a>: &#8220;The European Commission is taking the UK to court, claiming that UK law does not protect citizens&#8217; privacy as strongly as EU laws demand. The case centres on the UK Government&#8217;s response to the Phorm web monitoring scandal.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/out-law-NewsRoundUP/~4/KG8nHIE29fc" height="1" width="1">&#8220;</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.out-law.com/">OUT-LAW News</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/09/30/commission-takes-uk-to-court-over-alleged-privacy-law-failings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law firm could face first £500,000 data leak fine</title>
		<link>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/09/29/law-firm-could-face-first-500000-data-leak-fine/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/09/29/law-firm-could-face-first-500000-data-leak-fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACS:Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P2P file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlaw.org.uk/?p=3066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law firm could face first £500,000 data leak fine: &#8220;A law firm could be fined up to £500,000 by the Information Commissioner after the sensitive personal data of thousands of people was reportedly made public in error.&#8220;
(Via OUT-LAW News.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/out-law-NewsRoundUP/~3/EigRc2lYReM/default.aspx">Law firm could face first £500,000 data leak fine</a>: &#8220;A law firm could be fined up to £500,000 by the Information Commissioner after the sensitive personal data of thousands of people was reportedly made public in error.<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/out-law-NewsRoundUP/~4/EigRc2lYReM" height="1" width="1">&#8220;</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.out-law.com/">OUT-LAW News</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/09/29/law-firm-could-face-first-500000-data-leak-fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACS:Law&#8217;s mocking of 4chan could cost it £500k</title>
		<link>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/09/29/acslaws-mocking-of-4chan-could-cost-it-500k/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/09/29/acslaws-mocking-of-4chan-could-cost-it-500k/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACS:Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P2P file sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlaw.org.uk/?p=3056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ACS:Law&#8217;s mocking of 4chan could cost it £500k: &#8220;
Doin&#8217; it for the lulz
Off-the-cuff bravado aimed at internet pranksters has led to what must already rank as one of the worst ever data leaks, by the anti-filesharing solicitors ACS:Law.…
&#8220;
(Via The Register &#8211; Public Sector.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/28/acs_ico/">ACS:Law&#8217;s mocking of 4chan could cost it £500k</a>: &#8220;<br />
<h4>Doin&#8217; it for the lulz</h4>
<p>Off-the-cuff bravado aimed at internet pranksters has led to what must already rank as one of the worst ever data leaks, by the anti-filesharing solicitors ACS:Law.…</p>
<p>&#8220;</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/">The Register &#8211; Public Sector</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/09/29/acslaws-mocking-of-4chan-could-cost-it-500k/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Germany Asks Google to Surrender Private Data</title>
		<link>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/05/19/germany-asks-google-to-surrender-private-data/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/05/19/germany-asks-google-to-surrender-private-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 08:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Street View]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlaw.org.uk/?p=2836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Germany Asks Google to Surrender Private Data: &#8220;The demand by a German regulator increased pressure on the company over its collection of private data from unsecured home wireless networks.
(Via NYT > Technology.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feeds.nytimes.com/click.phdo?i=7237e0b87783ebfb419ae67c357aa5ce">Germany Asks Google to Surrender Private Data</a>: &#8220;The demand by a German regulator increased pressure on the company over its collection of private data from unsecured home wireless networks.</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/pages/technology/index.html?partner=rss">NYT > Technology</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/05/19/germany-asks-google-to-surrender-private-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>German court rejects police data snooping store</title>
		<link>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/03/03/german-court-rejects-police-data-snooping-store/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/03/03/german-court-rejects-police-data-snooping-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlaw.org.uk/?p=2642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[German court rejects police data snooping store: &#8220;
Leaves Euro spooks in limbo
Germany&#8217;s High Court has told police and secret services that they must stop storing email and telephone data and delete information already collected.…
&#8220;
(Via The Register &#8211; Public Sector.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/03/europe_snoop_law/">German court rejects police data snooping store</a>: &#8220;<br />
<h4>Leaves Euro spooks in limbo</h4>
<p>Germany&#8217;s High Court has told police and secret services that they must stop storing email and telephone data and delete information already collected.…</p>
<p>&#8220;</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/">The Register &#8211; Public Sector</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2010/03/03/german-court-rejects-police-data-snooping-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police arrest people just to create DNA records, claims ex-officer</title>
		<link>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/11/25/police-arrest-people-just-to-create-dna-records-claims-ex-officer/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/11/25/police-arrest-people-just-to-create-dna-records-claims-ex-officer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlaw.org.uk/?p=2296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police arrest people just to create DNA records, claims ex-officer: &#8220;Police are arresting people purely for the purpose of ensuring that their DNA is sampled and recorded on the police&#8217;s national database, a report by Government advisory body the Human Genetics Commission (HGC) has said.&#8221;
(Via OUT-LAW News.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=10548">Police arrest people just to create DNA records, claims ex-officer</a>: &#8220;Police are arresting people purely for the purpose of ensuring that their DNA is sampled and recorded on the police&#8217;s national database, a report by Government advisory body the Human Genetics Commission (HGC) has said.&#8221;</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.out-law.com/">OUT-LAW News</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/11/25/police-arrest-people-just-to-create-dna-records-claims-ex-officer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ISPs and public believe Government data safeguards inadequate</title>
		<link>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/11/20/isps-and-public-believe-government-data-safeguards-inadequate/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/11/20/isps-and-public-believe-government-data-safeguards-inadequate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlaw.org.uk/?p=2262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ISPs and public believe Government data safeguards inadequate: &#8220;The internet access industry and members of the public have rejected the Government&#8217;s plans to retain details of citizens&#8217; internet access, saying that safeguards for internet users&#8217; privacy were inadequate.&#8221;
(Via OUT-LAW News.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=10529">ISPs and public believe Government data safeguards inadequate</a>: &#8220;The internet access industry and members of the public have rejected the Government&#8217;s plans to retain details of citizens&#8217; internet access, saying that safeguards for internet users&#8217; privacy were inadequate.&#8221;</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.out-law.com/">OUT-LAW News</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/11/20/isps-and-public-believe-government-data-safeguards-inadequate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook adopts new privacy policy</title>
		<link>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/11/18/facebook-adopts-new-privacy-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/11/18/facebook-adopts-new-privacy-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Database Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlaw.org.uk/?p=2249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook adopts new privacy policy: (CNET)  Facebook has decided to adopt a revised privacy policy designed to be more accessible and easier to understand. The site also plans to add visual resources designed to make the document more accessible, such as a glossary of important terms and informational &#8216;learn more&#8217; videos. Facebook expects to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.qlinks.net/update/2009/11/facebook-adopts-new-privacy-policy.htm">Facebook adopts new privacy policy</a>: (CNET) <br /> Facebook has decided to adopt a revised privacy policy designed to be more accessible and easier to understand. The site also plans to add visual resources designed to make the document more accessible, such as a glossary of important terms and informational &#8216;learn more&#8217; videos. Facebook expects to post the revision in English, French, Italian, German, and Spanish soon. See <a href="http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=181160577130">company blog</a>.</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.qlinks.net/update/update.htm">QuickLinks Update</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/11/18/facebook-adopts-new-privacy-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICO chastises NHS over data losses</title>
		<link>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/11/16/ico-chastises-nhs-over-data-losses/</link>
		<comments>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/11/16/ico-chastises-nhs-over-data-losses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Database Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlaw.org.uk/?p=2227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ICO chastises NHS over data losses: &#8220;
A very leaky vessel indeed
NHS organisations were responsible for 30 per cent of the security breaches reported to the Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office over the last two years.…
&#8220;
(Via The Register &#8211; Public Sector.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/16/ico_nhs_data_loss/">ICO chastises NHS over data losses</a>: &#8220;<br />
<h4>A very leaky vessel indeed</h4>
<p>NHS organisations were responsible for 30 per cent of the security breaches reported to the Information Commissioner&#8217;s Office over the last two years.…</p>
<p>&#8220;</p>
<p>(Via <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/">The Register &#8211; Public Sector</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cyberlaw.org.uk/2009/11/16/ico-chastises-nhs-over-data-losses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

